WebThe Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows'.- 8 I.T.A. No. 451/Coch/2024 "7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Web% - 0 0 0 ) - % +% ! + = >> : 0 % ! 0 ! ... 9 ! + % 0 % ( ( )2 0 + ( 0 )- 0 %- % 0

Where assessee files its return u/s 44AD, it is not under

Web(hereinafter referred as Ld. Pr. CIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (herein after refered as the Act). 2. The facts in brief are that the assessee filed return of income of Rs. 1,44,320/- by computing income u/s 44AD of the Act. The case of the assessee was taken up for scrutiny and the ld AO made an addition of Rs. WebJun 29, 2010 · Case Name : CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 156 of 2010. Date of Judgement/Order : … hid-playstation驱动

睷眮瑡硧畲甮楮 - Tax Guru

WebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S M Anand on 23 August, 2024. Author: S.Sujatha And N.K.Sudhindrarao. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI … WebCIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), had held as follows:- “7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Sub-section (1) of section 44AD clearly provides that where an assessee is engaged in the business of civil construction or supply Webi) CIT v/s Surinder Pal Anand, Surinder Pal Anand, [2011] 242 CTR 0061 (P&H HC) Assessment being made under s. 44AD, the assessee was not under obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the bank unless such entry had no nexus with the gross receipts and therefore no addition under s. 68 was called for. how far back is pip backdated